Test Case
About Writing
Academic Writing
  • Artificial Intelligence and Aggregate Litigation — 103 Wash. U. L. Rev. 777 (2026).
  • Deterring Unenforceable Terms — 111 Va. L. Rev. 943 (2025).
  • The Deletion Remedy — 103 N.C. L. Rev. 1809 (2025).
  • Assembly-Line Plaintiffs — 135 Harv. L. Rev. 1704 (2022).
  • Class Action Boundaries — 90 Fordham L. Rev. 1611 (2022).
  • Did Bristol-Myers Squibb Kill the Nationwide Class Action? — 129 Yale L.J.F. 205 (2019).
  • Who Should Define Injuries for Article III Standing? — 68 Stan. L. Rev. Online 76 (2015).
  • AI-Generated Legal Texts (with Kevin Tobia) — working paper.
Other Writing
  • When AI Models Can Continually Learn, Will Our Regulations Be Able to Keep Up? — Lawfare, December 2025.
  • The Urgent Need for Civil Justice Reform — Boston Review, 2020.
  • The Fine Print That Could Undermine New Internet Privacy Legislation — The Washington Post, March 2019.
  • When It Comes to Partisan Gerrymandering, Inaction Is Not Neutrality — Take Care Blog, July 2019.
  • How to Beat Hobby Lobby: Move to State Court — Slate, July 2014.
  • Where to Draw the Line on Hate Speech? — The American Prospect, June 2012.
  • Abortion: The New Wedge Issue — The American Prospect, August 2012.
  • Myriad Genetics Can't Patent a Human Gene — Slate, April 2010.
  • Do Women Really Ask for Raises Less Frequently Than Men? — Slate, October 2009.

I'm Danny Wilf-Townsend, an Associate Professor of Law at Georgetown Law. This is my blog.

Other Recent Writing

  • Artificial Intelligence and Aggregate Litigation
  • The Deletion Remedy
  • Regulating Continual Learning in AI
All publications →

Subscribe

Check your inbox for a confirmation email.

Something went wrong. Please try again.

or via RSS

© 2026 Danny Wilf-Townsend RSS About